why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Keep this to general Beretta/Board/Community topics.

Has any one else had this problem?

YES
2
67%
NO
0
No votes
HEARD OF IT HAPPENING
1
33%
 
Total votes: 3

2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

I've had a 90 with a 2.2 in it and now I have a 95, and the head gasket blew on both of em'. Somebody know why this happens?
1994 AQUA ZED
User avatar
Asylum
Registered User
Posts: 3050
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:36 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by Asylum »

It's a fairly common problem on that engine series.

Not too hard a fix, but still a pain!
Eric

Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!






'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
User avatar
KFLO 93 GT
Registered User
Posts: 846
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 2:46 am
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by KFLO 93 GT »

Aluminum head on an iron block. If you're an idiot and you start the car up and beat on it when its cold that is going to happen.

2.2s don't suck, worthless owners suck. :sparta

Besides, its only a 5 or 6 hour job total that can be done with basic hand tools. :o
Image
93 GTs
User avatar
Barry
Global Moderator
Posts: 1871
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Hatfield Pa

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by Barry »

They get beat on much more often too due to there lower power output.
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

First off I meant why do not why so. I'm far from a worthless owner too, My beretta is my baby, I bought it w/ 30k on it and it has been my daily driver for years. I've also maintaned it acceptionally well, although you may not think so because I apperently BEAT IT.
1994 AQUA ZED
User avatar
weba
Registered User
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:34 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by weba »

The head gaskets wont live long since those engines have EGR designed so that it heats the other end of the cylinder head more :burn:
User avatar
themixer
Registered User
Posts: 1569
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Truro, Nova Scotia. Canada

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by themixer »

the only 2.2 headgasket that i have ever done myself i put on with a strongarm (this was before i knew of torque wrench) car went about 80000km before the heatercore split and it overheated cracked the head best 2.2 i ever had. cheaper to replace the motor in the end
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

Has anyone ever heard of it happening to one w/ a 5 speed? I found one w/ 150k on it. It's a 96' light blue and in amazing shape. It's on a used car lot here in p.a for $1995. If you go to cars or autotrader.com and search for Berettas you will find it. Theres like 20 pics of it. Tell me what ya think and if anyone's ever heard it happen to a 5 speed. If nobody has i just might buy it, not for that price though, I'll try for like $1300-1500
Thanks Err1
1994 AQUA ZED
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

A 2.2 is a 2.2. Different trans doesn't affect pre-existing engine conditions that are known to occur. There are no guarantees in this life.
Image
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

I just thought it might make a diffrence because you can control the revs better and you don't have to wind it out as much so the
engine would'nt get beat on as badly. I was pickin' up a rim and the guy who works at the place has a 93' base w/ a 2.2 5 speed w/ almost 200k on it and he has never had a problem with the head.
I got the guy who has the 96' on his lot to settle at $1500. I'm gonna get it i think and just hope the engine holds up.
1994 AQUA ZED
GrrtRUDE95
Registered User
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:07 pm

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by GrrtRUDE95 »

Mine has 109k on it and it has been THE most reliable car I have EVER had.
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

Good to know. Is it a 5 speed? As soon as I sell the base I got now for what ever I can get for it Ima get the 96'. I can't wait! The car is in amazing shape, and I got some plans for it too.
1994 AQUA ZED
GrrtRUDE95
Registered User
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:07 pm

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by GrrtRUDE95 »

No It is an Automatic.
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

I wish I had your luck, hopefully I will w/ this 96'. Open the hood when it's running and see if you smell coolant. belive me catch it early, if you do you will only have to replace gaskets not the whole head. Good luck with it.
1994 AQUA ZED
2.2H8TA
Registered User
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:59 am
Location: NE-PA
Contact:

Re: why so 2.2's suck so bad?

Post by 2.2H8TA »

Here it is
Attachments
9 6.jpg
96.jpg
96'.jpg
1994 AQUA ZED
Post Reply