Fuel Injector Ratings
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Wow, all this over some injectors that are too small to do anything serious with anyways...
People expect too much for free, If the information is wrong then fix it. BTW, it's Multec not Multitek.. may want to get that fixed, i wouldn't want someone to get confused about wrong information being posted.
People expect too much for free, If the information is wrong then fix it. BTW, it's Multec not Multitek.. may want to get that fixed, i wouldn't want someone to get confused about wrong information being posted.


'91 Z24 - 13.07 @ 108 All Motor N/A
'89 Camaro RS - 3500/700R4, 3500 stall, Street/Strip shift kit, 3.73 Posi rear, Custom Longtubes, big cam etc....
'03 Avalanche Z71- DD
- woody90gtz
- Registered User
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 8:45 pm
- Location: Walton, NY
- Contact:
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
I will help out with the site if needed. It's a shame to let it go down when there is so much information there. I have lots of website experience (none with forums) but if you need any HTML let me know.
91 "SS" - WOT 3400/5spd - 13.29@101.6 - World's fastest N/A FWD Beretta
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
- 3400beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:21 am
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
I don't know what you guys are worried about. The site is full of misinformation (which is apparently too much of a job to correct - I guess the donations haven't been coming in..), and incase you hadn't noticed, most of the intelligent people either barely post or don't even visit the site anymore. Its really not that big of a loss, and I can see WOT heading in the same direction quite soon. This is what happens when something is run by a complete asshat - people realize and go elsewhere.
Until today I didn't think Brad would act like this (and I know hes on vacation right now) - which makes me suspect ben is really behind this.
Until today I didn't think Brad would act like this (and I know hes on vacation right now) - which makes me suspect ben is really behind this.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:06 pm
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Fail.
Last edited by SappySE107 on Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 3400beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:21 am
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Good one 

Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
I was on vacation last week, but I am back this week. So no, Ben is not behind this at all...
- 3400beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:21 am
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Can't you come up with anything else to say for yourself? You've called me stupid how many times now.. Is this a normal practice of yours? Calling your customers stupid?
Say something else Ben.. give me and everyone else more reasons not to buy stuff from you.
Say something else Ben.. give me and everyone else more reasons not to buy stuff from you.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:06 pm
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
If you can't differentiate 60DegreeV6.com and WOT-Tech, that is your own damn problem.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Whoa! Good job guys! You think Ben and Brad have nothing better to do then their site?! It's part of their hobby, something they share out of a common interest, they don't have to do it! If they want to tell you to go take a flyin leap they can and I'd support them on it! The info on cars has been stretched, pulled opinionated, manipulated beyond ANYTHING that can be deemed 100% accurate! Your going to have info that don't line up. You thick skulls need an example?
How many 1968 Hurst Olds did they build?
What is the actual stock HP rating of a '68 hurst olds?
How many had A/C?
How many were not released?
Most of you probably don't even know what the hell a HO is! But 90% of the info posted on the above questions have 50 different answers! So which site is better? The one you tend to lean more towards in your general opinion.
I'm greatful to brad and ben for having 60deg. It is more well thought out, put together, kept updated, organized then any other site of cluster fuks on the net that I've seen. Better then here for sure!
Keep up the good work Brad and Ben, some of us appreciate it. SEMPER FI
How many 1968 Hurst Olds did they build?
What is the actual stock HP rating of a '68 hurst olds?
How many had A/C?
How many were not released?
Most of you probably don't even know what the hell a HO is! But 90% of the info posted on the above questions have 50 different answers! So which site is better? The one you tend to lean more towards in your general opinion.
I'm greatful to brad and ben for having 60deg. It is more well thought out, put together, kept updated, organized then any other site of cluster fuks on the net that I've seen. Better then here for sure!
Keep up the good work Brad and Ben, some of us appreciate it. SEMPER FI
- Vampcrist
- Registered User
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:28 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
- Contact:
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
So I haven't been around for long but good work is constant work in my opinion. If someone has a website that they have told people they aren't going to do anything but keep making payments on then yeah no one is going to want to go there. Every forum has information on it reguardless of who runs it but those that run it should have more know-how then the people posting on it to where bad information can be fixed. So with that being said what should it matter you got one member over there that was talking smack that brought you all over to gloat. Sounds to me you all are more like a rash that just keeps spreading then someone thats helpful. I'm sorry I'm going to trust those that actually will help you look up information not just tell you your wrong or just straight doesn't have an answer.
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Feel free to show me where it is wrong, and I will fix it. And you never told me. Unless its buried in a thread somewhere...3X00-Modified wrote:The info on 60degreev6 is wrong and they failed to listen to me.
If you want me to search through the 200k+ posts and fix each and every instance of incorrect data, well... I'll start when you guys start over here. I'm sure I could find plenty of incorrect information throughout the threads on here. Nature of the internet. And to quote an email I received today...
"Who the hell decided that you should be responsible for all the content, anyway? It's a fuking public forum for cryin' out loud..."
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Perhaps I just need to be like here and add a disclaimer to all of the content...
"We are not responsible for errors or ommissions in this information. Use it at your own risk!"
Of which, there are spelling errors... But hey, 60v6 is the only site that is full of crap!
"We are not responsible for errors or ommissions in this information. Use it at your own risk!"
Of which, there are spelling errors... But hey, 60v6 is the only site that is full of crap!
- Asylum
- Registered User
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:36 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Everybody just STOP IT!!
I made a thread about a simple injector schedule and everybody got their shorts in a knot.
I have WOT parts and they happen to be on what is now the quickest N/A Beretta we know of. And Rodney tunes it!
If that makes Ben's parts, Rodney's tuning and my selection of product stupid and irrelevant, then I pity the rest of you!
I think more responsibility should be directed toward some sites, especially if wrong information is known about, but for heaven's sake, we are all looking for the same thing, aren't we?
Have a beer and let's enjoy the fact a 3500 N/A Beretta with a damn 3t40 can keep pace with most anything the muscle car era produced and gets 24 mpg. 13.57 @ 103 MPH

I made a thread about a simple injector schedule and everybody got their shorts in a knot.
I have WOT parts and they happen to be on what is now the quickest N/A Beretta we know of. And Rodney tunes it!
If that makes Ben's parts, Rodney's tuning and my selection of product stupid and irrelevant, then I pity the rest of you!
I think more responsibility should be directed toward some sites, especially if wrong information is known about, but for heaven's sake, we are all looking for the same thing, aren't we?
Have a beer and let's enjoy the fact a 3500 N/A Beretta with a damn 3t40 can keep pace with most anything the muscle car era produced and gets 24 mpg. 13.57 @ 103 MPH

Eric
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
- Money pit Beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 6411
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:36 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Oh man this is crazy. I like WOT and 60*. I haven't joined 60* because I have nothing to add. Get Woody to help and keep the site up. There are many of us that need this site and 60*. Please work it out and ask around for others to step up and help. We don't have alot of support for these engines and need to keep all that we have.
keep'em flying!
Re: Fuel Injector Ratings
Umm, its been back up since yesterday evening... Did a software update while it was down, in fact.