Re: The Official Beretta.net Decals
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 11:02 am
What she said!Beretta_gal wrote:I would like to have that decal put on a shirt!!!!

Official Chevrolet Beretta Owners Forums
https://www.beretta.net/forum/
What she said!Beretta_gal wrote:I would like to have that decal put on a shirt!!!!
If you have the original artwork yes... if your working off a small JPEG image then no it will come out like crap.Chad91GTZ wrote:Easy enpigh tobresize something like that
Oh crap! I was going to add those Northeast shirts to cafepress! I forgot.3X00-Modified wrote:If you have the original artwork yes... if your working off a small JPEG image then no it will come out like crap.Chad91GTZ wrote:Easy enpigh tobresize something like that
Maybe shoot Wanako a message and see if he wants to do that through Cafe Press.
Geoff, sorry I didn't see this, dude. Yeah, I've got white ones. How many and GT or Z?90GTZHO wrote:hey gerson you got any white ones left by chance?
I wanted a few of them shirts! lol. I really like the design, i sent money for them and havent heard anything about getting it back or else i would order them off there.woody90gtz wrote:Oh crap! I was going to add those Northeast shirts to cafepress! I forgot.3X00-Modified wrote:If you have the original artwork yes... if your working off a small JPEG image then no it will come out like crap.Chad91GTZ wrote:Easy enpigh tobresize something like that
Maybe shoot Wanako a message and see if he wants to do that through Cafe Press.
Edit: done!
http://www.cafepress.com/woody2136
As Wanako said, Original artwork will give a better result. Jpeg's are compressed so quality is crap and if you have to enlarge it any bit you'll see pixels... Vector graphics have clean sharp edges that do not get grainy when blown up, Cafe Press would have probably recommended a vector graphic for best results.Chad91GTZ wrote:The jpg he posted seems like it shoulda been big enough. How big do you want it? Twice as big as the sticker?
You are correct, but surprisingly, cafepress doesn't accept vector graphics. The high-res raster stuff works just fine though, I always use PNG format so even though it's raster, it isn't compressed and it still has transparency.3X00-Modified wrote:As Wanako said, Original artwork will give a better result. Jpeg's are compressed so quality is crap and if you have to enlarge it any bit you'll see pixels... Vector graphics have clean sharp edges that do not get grainy when blown up, Cafe Press would have probably recommended a vector graphic for best results.
Yea, I saw that. I was also thinking of using PNG mainly to maintain Transperancy. Thanks for clearing that up.woody90gtz wrote:You are correct, but surprisingly, cafepress doesn't accept vector graphics. The high-res raster stuff works just fine though, I always use PNG format so even though it's raster, it isn't compressed and it still has transparency.3X00-Modified wrote:As Wanako said, Original artwork will give a better result. Jpeg's are compressed so quality is crap and if you have to enlarge it any bit you'll see pixels... Vector graphics have clean sharp edges that do not get grainy when blown up, Cafe Press would have probably recommended a vector graphic for best results.