1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ - Updated.

Tell us about your Beretta and Post an Image
Locked
speedy
Registered User
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:10 pm

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by speedy »

i had this same problem, but i cant think of how i fixed it...


1991 beretta GTZ- 2.3l w41 cams, ported 086 head with a 3 angle valve job, fidanza flywheel with exedy racing clutch, 3.94fdr from and scx, so much more..
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

Cliff8928 wrote:You can't read the temp with your OBDI scanner?
What do you mean exactly? Of course not. For OBDI Ford and GM , I use OBDI only scanners. I have an OBDII scanner, reader for OBDII. I'm missing what you may be getting at. I'm not having trouble seeing my engine temp. Coolant Temp Sender for the gauge is working fine. I'm having trouble getting the fan to come on when the engine REACHES a certain temp via my Coolant Temp SENSOR. Gotta be a connection problem somewhere I would think at this point.

Speedy, if you remember how you fixed it, I'm all ears buddy. :D


Image
Cliff8928
Administrator
Posts: 1775
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: Long Grove, IL
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by Cliff8928 »

Then you just have one of those "code readers"? There are full-blown scanners that will read that data just like on an OBD-II car. I've done it on my '89. You can actually see if the temperature and if the ECM commands the fan on.


Cliff Scott
Image
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

That's what I thought you might be getting at Cliff. I COULD go that route, but while I don't know the EXACT temp my car is hitting , I let it get about 3/4 on the temp gauge before taking off down the road on a cooling run since the fan never would kick on. That should be equivalent to about 250* plus , MORE than enough to kick the fan.

So, if I'm reading between the lines correctly here, are you hypothesizing that perhaps my ECM is not triggering the fan?

Also , the ECM kicks the fan on while in diagnostic mode, albeit not the same situation I know.

You think maybe I should test the ECM?


Image
Cliff8928
Administrator
Posts: 1775
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: Long Grove, IL
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by Cliff8928 »

Not quite like that... The CTS reports the temp to the ECM, the ECM engages the cooling fan relay at the desired temerature..

If you can view what data the ECM is actually reading from the sensor, then maybe you can isolate the problem. Also you can do things like mess with the plug on the sensor to see if the readings change.

Also, if you completely unplug the CTS, you should end up throwing a code 15 which will cause the fan to come on.

It's only the old-school GM stuff that had a sensor that directly triggered the relay.


Cliff Scott
Image
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

Also, the fan I believe should kick on at 210* F in the Quads. Now I'm sort of wondering about the ECM as it supplies a 5 volt charge to the CTS and when the coolant is low detects high resistance and when the coolant is hot SHOULD detect low resistance and trip the fan relay.

But then again, that could also be a poor connector causing the ECM to think the coolant is always cold. So I think I shall go ahead and try the pigtail first as it's the cheaper, simpler thing to try first.

Thanks for making me think that out Cliff. You make a good sounding board! :D


Image
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

Yes,you're correct. I've been up since 5 am and thought about my post immediately after making it. That's why I corrected myself,lol. My bad.

I DID forget about unplugging the sensor and seeing if that trips the fan though. Quick and easy way to test the ECM I guess. Thanks again. Will try these things and report back.


Image
Cliff8928
Administrator
Posts: 1775
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: Long Grove, IL
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by Cliff8928 »

The CTS is actually resistance to ground, not 5V like the MAP, EGR, TPS, etc...


Cliff Scott
Image
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

Right. We're saying the same things in different ways. :D
Most engine functions are affected by the coolant temperature. Determining whether the engine is hot or cold is largely dependent on the temperature of the coolant. An accurate temperature signal to the PCM is supplied by the coolant temperature sensor or Engine Coolant Temperature (ECT) sensor. The coolant temperature sensor is a thermistor mounted in the engine coolant stream. A thermistor is an electrical device that varies its resistance in relation to changes in temperature. Low coolant temperature produces a high resistance and high coolant temperature produces low resistance. The PCM supplies a signal of 5 volts to the coolant temperature sensor through a resistor in the PCM and measures the voltage. The voltage will be high when the engine is cold and low when the engine is hot.
So, after chatting today on here, I went out, unhooked my CTS and wala, fan came right on with both new and old relays. So, I think we can assume the ECM is good and doing its job. I was already pretty sure of that. I think we can ALSO assume the pigtail , corroded though it is inside the one pin in the plug, is at LEAST making enough connection to let the ECM know it's THERE. And I could tell as soon as I unplugged and plugged it back in. Car ran like crap w/o it plugged in (of course) and great with it plugged back in. So, here's where we are at in my estimation:

Fan: Known good
Fan Relay: Known good
CTS: Known good
ECM: Seems to be known good. No other signs from ANY component pointing to ECM failure.
CTS Pigtail connector: SEEMS to be fair, but some corrosion in pins would warrant replacement.

If that doesn't do it, I'm at a loss except to start tracing wires to look for an open or break. Any other ideas Cliff or anyone?


Image
90GTZHO
Registered User
Posts: 1068
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:54 am
Location: Paulden, AZ
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by 90GTZHO »

Change the pigtail either way. If i saw there was corrosion on any of my pigtail pins, i would be changing it right away! Even the slightest bit of corrosion can cause serious problems. I should know, i spent over a year and a half working with car batteries. And a lil bit of corrosion there would cause a car to not start, so imagine what it could do with smaller pinouts ;) Keep us posted on what happens Mike!


Geoff
95 Base V6: Current Project; Work In Progress
Cliff8928
Administrator
Posts: 1775
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: Long Grove, IL
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by Cliff8928 »

I think you should have a good way of scanning the ECM so you can read what data it is seeing.. You can get handheld units that do this, or PC based units which are actually cheaper!

I don't like the idea of replacing pigtails unless it's really necessary... But if you do just make sure it's a good weathertight connection. I would prefer just installing a new connector/terminals on the same wire if you have more room on it...

Connector

Terminals


Cliff Scott
Image
90GTZHO
Registered User
Posts: 1068
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:54 am
Location: Paulden, AZ
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by 90GTZHO »

well thats what i meant, its late and my brain doesnt work lol. I was refering to the pins and connector, for some reason i was thinkin that was the pigtail lol


Geoff
95 Base V6: Current Project; Work In Progress
User avatar
scd88ga
Registered User
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:02 pm
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by scd88ga »

90GTZHO wrote: i was thinkin that was the pigtail lol
That's because it is! :D

Don't even start talking about this wiring stuff, all you're doing is reminding me of when I had to build a new 88 Mitsubishi Starion ESIR engine wiring harness from scratch! Boo too tedious BS wiring work on cars, it's no fun!

Mike, if that doesn't fix the issue, I'd start looking at that ECM again...


'94 Quad 4 H.O. 5 speed Z26, Red & Rare! 1 of 896 Quad Z26's and of those it's 1 of 167 red paint/gray interior!
Need A Quality Used Part? Contact me at Posihead Auto Parts!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Posihead ... 3779691724
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

Yes, I HAVE a scanner like the one you speak of Cliff. Unfortunately 95% of my business is OBDII so the scanner I purchased that does that is for OBDII only. I have two of the OBDI code readers that ONLY read codes too. One for Ford, one for GM.

My OBDII scan tool/reader is for all OBDII equipped vehicles.

And yes, the pigtail INCLUDES about 6 inches of new wire, the connector and new terminals. I kind of thought that was common knowledge. It's already put together too! :P

Image

If the pigtail doesn't do the trick , I may have to go back to testing on the ECM.


Image
User avatar
SuzukiGhostRider
Registered User
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:07 am
Location: Milan NM
Contact:

Re: 1992 Quasar Beretta GTZ

Post by SuzukiGhostRider »

So, the Quasar got the Claybar treatment today. MAJOR DIFFERENCE if I do say so myself. I think you may rather enjoy the following pictures! :D I do!


Image
Locked