Page 1 of 1
Re: keep or not
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:02 pm
by Money pit Beretta
If it were me I'd keep the Beretta, but I think some here would like to buy it. Did you ever post photos?
Re: keep or not
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:08 pm
by Cliff8928
It really depends on what you need… I wouldn't worry much about a 3T40 trans. It's more reliable than your 4L60-E.
Re: keep or not
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:41 pm
by Gtzman
Where you from ill buy the Beretta!
Re: keep or not
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:58 am
by Rettax3
Keep the Beretta. '90 is the best year for them (I have three). I hate SUVs. Gas mileage on SUVs suck (compared to most Berettas, at least). Berettas are really cool. Berettas do really well in the snow and ice too, if you have decent tires on them (possibly decent may equal studded-snows, depending on where you live. I lived in a place that got 40 inches of snow in 26 hours, so... Yeah, I ran studded snow tires). SUVs are top-heavy and are more likely to roll over. Berettas are faster-looking than Blazers. 65k miles is really low for a 23 year old car, 180k miles is alot on an auto-equipped SUV. There is a 600+ year-old company that makes guns, named 'Beretta', too cool. SUV headlights sit too high, and blind me. I hate SUVs. Keep the Beretta...
There see, totally
un-biased opinion...
To all of you that want to quote some/all of the above and make rude or just out-raged comments on:

Seriously... Was that really a stupid answer? The guy just asked a
Beretta site for opinions on if he should keep a 65k-mile Beretta GT, or a Blazer...

What did you think I was gonna say?
dpmeeks1207, any pics (of the
Beretta)?
Re: keep or not
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:08 am
by Rettax3
Blazers tend to have front-end problems after a lot of miles, and I've heard it is really tough to get them right once things start wearing out. Other than that, they aren't a bad vehicle. Keep both...
