Updated pics...
- woody90gtz
- Registered User
- Posts: 4741
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 8:45 pm
- Location: Walton, NY
- Contact:
Re: Updated pics...
For some reason I thought you had 18s, not 17s. 225/45R17s are almost dead-nuts stock height.
91 "SS" - WOT 3400/5spd - 13.29@101.6 - World's fastest N/A FWD Beretta
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 11:21 pm
- Location: South Central MN
Re: Updated pics...
cliff,
You really should get those other manifolds back on, such a huge difference in flow.
NICE PIC. Where's the full-size version?
You really should get those other manifolds back on, such a huge difference in flow.
NICE PIC. Where's the full-size version?
94 Beretta Z26 57,4xx miles
3100, auto, crank windows, power locks/trunk, A/C,
To many mods to list
-intercooler
Among beretta boards
1st Turbo 4t60-e
1st Turbo 3100
1st Turbo Z26
1st 94+ Turbo
3100, auto, crank windows, power locks/trunk, A/C,
To many mods to list
-intercooler

Among beretta boards
1st Turbo 4t60-e
1st Turbo 3100
1st Turbo Z26
1st 94+ Turbo
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: Long Grove, IL
- Contact:
Re: Updated pics...
I didn't buy the full size version... Maybe I should.
I'm looking to get headers on it.. I need someone to duplicate a set of long-tubes I already have, but in stainless with the right flanges.
I'm looking to get headers on it.. I need someone to duplicate a set of long-tubes I already have, but in stainless with the right flanges.
Cliff Scott


- IsaacHayes
- Registered User
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:32 pm
- Location: Missouri
Re: Updated pics...
Cliff you should get some of the WOT/SDI headers... That will cure your problem!
I don't see much difference looking at the front and rear wheels... doesn't look like 225 in rear or 245 in front looks same, I don't see the rear super stretched or the front bulging... strange.
I don't see much difference looking at the front and rear wheels... doesn't look like 225 in rear or 245 in front looks same, I don't see the rear super stretched or the front bulging... strange.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: Long Grove, IL
- Contact:
Re: Updated pics...
You won't see a huge difference like that because 8.5" is within the acceptable range for both tire sizes.
Cliff Scott


- IsaacHayes
- Registered User
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:32 pm
- Location: Missouri
Re: Updated pics...
I have 225's on the 18"s on the orange car and they looked stretched to death, much like 205's look like on 7" wide wheels. 225's will go on 7" wide wheels too but have more bulge. I know the 18"s are not 17"s, but still they aren't 8.5", (actually don't know wtf they are yet) but I'd think 20mm difference you'd see.
Did I read it right that the net front offset is 20mm??? That just doesn't seem right.
Did I read it right that the net front offset is 20mm??? That just doesn't seem right.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: Long Grove, IL
- Contact:
Re: Updated pics...
I do believe that's the offset as I figured it (38mm spacer).
The tires may also not look stretched because of the way the rim protector is designed into the goodyear tires..
The tires may also not look stretched because of the way the rim protector is designed into the goodyear tires..
Cliff Scott

