Re: lightweight flywheel from 2004 3100
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 11:51 am
Yeah i was gonna say 40-50 is a bit high and I figured someone would have one for 20 or so
Official Chevrolet Beretta Owners Forums
https://www.beretta.net/forum/
Lots of guys on NastyZ run 8" converters for that reason. The converter is lighter, but the wet weight is significantly lighter. I noticed that when I went to an alum radiator on the Camaro that was smaller than stock.Barry wrote:The weight of the flexplate is not very important. Even shaving 2 lbs, you still have a 40-60 lb torque converter to spin. Looking into a lighter converter or one that holds less fluid is going to help more.
KFLO 93 GT wrote:Slinky - if you want one so badly... I've pretty sure the one from my 04 3400 is hanging in my shop. Pay $20 plus $10 to ship and its yours.
If you have ever worked on any race application you will realize that 2lbs does matter a lot. Granted I do not believe that it is that much of a difference. If it didn't why would people count ounces when it comes to spring retainers and locks.Barry wrote:The weight of the flexplate is not very important. Even shaving 2 lbs, you still have a 40-60 lb torque converter to spin. Looking into a lighter converter or one that holds less fluid is going to help more.
Spring retainers & locks have to go move both ways, so you do not want them to store energy. A flywheel/pressure plate or flexplate/torque converter move in only one direction and in most applications the stored energy is valuable.3X00-Modified wrote:If you have ever worked on any race application you will realize that 2lbs does matter a lot. Granted I do not believe that it is that much of a difference. If it didn't why would people count ounces when it comes to spring retainers and locks.Barry wrote:The weight of the flexplate is not very important. Even shaving 2 lbs, you still have a 40-60 lb torque converter to spin. Looking into a lighter converter or one that holds less fluid is going to help more.