2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Keep this to general Beretta/Board/Community topics.
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

found a 3100 from a 2003 malibu,what am i looking at to see if it will work in my 95z26.TIA.
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

it's got 123,557 miles on it he is asking 650.00 can hear run,malibu it is currently in, was wrecked in front but he said nothing is up against engine.radiator got busted though.will i need his harness or could i use mine.will my tranny bolt up or am i just looking at buying his tranny too.was told from this forum to get a 2000 up and to stay away from 90's anything.
User avatar
Asylum
Registered User
Posts: 3050
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:36 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by Asylum »

Why in heavens name would you pay that much money for a motor with that mileage?

Might be worth a couple hundred bucks TOPS!

http://www.car-parts.com

Have a look there. Hell 3400's and 3500's can be had for as little as $400 at times.
Eric

Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!






'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
User avatar
woody90gtz
Registered User
Posts: 4741
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Walton, NY
Contact:

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by woody90gtz »

Everything will all bolt up fine and can be made to work, but like Eric said, you could probably find a lower-mileage higher-power 3400 for less money if you look around. I paid more for my 3400, but it only had 4k miles so I felt it was worth it.
91 "SS" - WOT 3400/5spd - 13.29@101.6 - World's fastest N/A FWD Beretta
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
User avatar
KFLO 93 GT
Registered User
Posts: 846
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 2:46 am
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by KFLO 93 GT »

It is a direct swap over. All of your wiring harness plugs in and the bellhousing bolt pattern is the same too. However, as stated that's not too good of a deal. That engine will probably need intake gaskets which in itself is enough reason to seek a 2003 or newer 31 or 3400.

I got my 2004 3400 with only 39k for $550.
Image
93 GTs
User avatar
G9T2Z
Registered User
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by G9T2Z »

I just bought a 2004 3500 with 43K miles for $400 Canadian. There are definitely better deals out there. Whoops, I guess the cat's out of the bag now =)
Image
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

Sir Cranky wrote:Why in heavens name would you pay that much money for a motor with that mileage?

Might be worth a couple hundred bucks TOPS!

http://www.car-parts.com

Have a look there. Hell 3400's and 3500's can be had for as little as $400 at times.

I think 650 is a pretty good deal considering i can hear it run.if i buy a used engine from a boneyard it's alot of work to find out you got a engine worse than what you started with.
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

woody90gtz wrote:Everything will all bolt up fine and can be made to work, but like Eric said, you could probably find a lower-mileage higher-power 3400 for less money if you look around. I paid more for my 3400, but it only had 4k miles so I felt it was worth it.
I don't know what is involved with a 3400 upgrade but i have read on here that they have the same problems as the 3100.
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

KFLO 93 GT wrote:It is a direct swap over. All of your wiring harness plugs in and the bellhousing bolt pattern is the same too. However, as stated that's not too good of a deal. That engine will probably need intake gaskets which in itself is enough reason to seek a 2003 or newer 31 or 3400.

I got my 2004 3400 with only 39k for $550.
it is a 2003 malibu the 3100 would be coming from.
He told me the intake gaskets were already replaced a year or so ago by the dealer.
He also stated that he just put a new alternator on recently.
but hey if you guys think 650 is to much,i could try to negotiate a lower price,worse thing he'll say is no 650 firm.
i asked him how much to pull the engine from the 2003 malibu plus pull my 3100 and install his 3100 he said 1300.to me that don't sound to bad am i wrong?
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

G9T2Z wrote:I just bought a 2004 3500 with 43K miles for $400 Canadian. There are definitely better deals out there. Whoops, I guess the cat's out of the bag now =)
is a 3500 a direct swap? or is there alot of modifying involved.
jeff540
Registered User
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:39 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by jeff540 »

Sir Cranky wrote:Why in heavens name would you pay that much money for a motor with that mileage?

Might be worth a couple hundred bucks TOPS!

http://www.car-parts.com

Have a look there. Hell 3400's and 3500's can be had for as little as $400 at times.
checked out car-parts.com what year do i look for? 2003 they are wanting over a grand.
User avatar
Wanako
Registered User
Posts: 1098
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:29 am
Location: Torrance, CA

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by Wanako »

yea, you may hear it running, but then you won't know how much longer it will run. if you get one from the yard you can make sure it runs and that it will run for a long time by refreshing it. This is what I did with mine.
User avatar
woody90gtz
Registered User
Posts: 4741
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Walton, NY
Contact:

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by woody90gtz »

If I'm correct in my assumptions, a 3500 is more involved in that the MAP is different and the throttle body can't be used, and you need a TCE crank trigger.

A 3400 is nearly a direct swap, just like a 3100...and the 3100 you're looking at still has the same design flaw with intake gaskets as a 3400, so I'm not sure what you're worried about there. In the end it's up to you and what you want to do.
91 "SS" - WOT 3400/5spd - 13.29@101.6 - World's fastest N/A FWD Beretta
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
User avatar
3400beretta
Registered User
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:21 am

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by 3400beretta »

Is this guy offering a warranty? I doubt it..

Wait a minute.. hes going to charge YOU to pull the engine from the malibu? Uhhh.. ya, rip off bud.

All 2003 and newer engines have the "updated" intake gaskets - they are BETTER than the older design, but still not perfect. If the dealer replaced the intake gaskets on that 3100, they would have replaced them with the exact same ones that were in there from the factory. They should last a long time, a lot longer than the pre 2003 - but they are definately not perfect.

You should look for a 3400, its a direct swap (same as the newer 3100) but more power, and if you stick to a 2003+ then they have the better gaskets. Otherwise you can buy an older engine, and swap the gaskets yourself with the felpro metal ones, that will last forever. 3400's came in lots of cars - grand ams, aleros, venture van, equinox, etc. Look again on car-part. You will find what you need

P.s. you can't use that alternator from the malibu. Go do some reading at www.3400swap.com
User avatar
3X00-Modified
Administrator
Posts: 10916
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Brooklyn CT

Re: 2003 malibu 3100 in a 95 z26

Post by 3X00-Modified »

3400beretta wrote: P.s. you can't use that alternator from the malibu.
Finally someone else caught it! lol
Mr.Pink
Supreme Unit
Sleepy Goodness
"Beretta Guy"
Post Reply